Work in progress — Multiplex: Chapter 8 cover. (The notable events in Chapter 8 include Devi & Jason’s break-up and then his poorly handled attempts to tell Becky how he felt about her.)
I feel like the background needs a little more.
Sneak preview of an upcoming bonus comic from Chapter 8, set immediately before Multiplex #144.
Using Channels to isolate underdrawings
My drawing/comicking process is always changing, like everybody’s, and right now, I’m trying to figure out how to do the hand-drawn stuff faster and better. I’m sure someone else in the universe has thought of this before me, but I figured out a neat trick recently that may be of interest for people who prefer doing preliminary sketches by hand (or can’t afford a 24” Cintiq).
[By the way, sorry if this gets rambly. I’m mostly writing this for myself.]
First, some context:
I do a few passes of preliminary sketch when I do hand-drawn art, in order to correct mistakes and composition and tighten my drawings. It’s a lot of “extra” work, but I think it benefits my drawings.
I scan my pencils in, then print them out in 7% cyan (effectively a non-photo blue) to ink over with a brush, markers, or whatever. A lot of people do this, and it’s great; it lets you digitally tweak your pencils before inking (if needed), and acts like a back-up in case you screw up your pencils egregiously at the inking stage.
BEFORE I even draw my final pencils, though, I often do tiny thumbs, then roughs, then loose pencils. My thumbs are practically scribbles — just detailed enough to create a panel breakdown in Illustrator. I print the panel borders out in 7% cyan and then draw in the figures and background roughly. If I scan my thumbnails or roughs in, I might scan a page three times before I’m done inking, which is time consuming and a waste of paper.
Now, a lot of artists have gravitated to Non-Photo Blue Colerase pencils, and I love Colerase, but the Non-Photo Blue is too light for my taste. Instead, I use Light Green (20052) for very rough sketching and Blue (20044) for somewhat tighter, rough pencils. The Light Green is dark enough to see, but light enough that it doesn’t compete visually with the Blue when you’re tightening things in the next pass. (I will use Non-Photo Blue with either color, to do perspective grid lines and things like that.)
When you scan these roughs in RGB, you will see the green and the blue pencils in the full-color file, of course. But if you show only the green channel of the file, you will only see the BLUE pencil drawings (even where the two overlap). Yes, that is correct — with the red and blue channels hidden (showing only the green), you will see the BLUE pencils. The two colors stay almost entirely within the blue and green channels so that I can easily separate them in Photoshop (I haven’t tried using the red channel with a third color yet) in order to make grayscale art from just my Blue pencils, yet I’m also saving my Light Green roughs at the same time.
With the right scanning software, most channels will let you scan individual channels (as gray, naturally) — so you could scan just the Green channel to get the Blue pencil artwork in a grayscale image file.
Take a look at the photo gallery for the full color view, as well as the two colors separately. You can also see the inked art at http://www.multiplexcomic.com/strip/702
This process saves me the extra step of scanning in my roughs, it’s both easier and better (more precise) than using a lightbox, and also uses less paper.
Thoughts?
HEY, DID I MISS ANYTHING?
Well, shit. The season 3 finale — which (as others have pointed out) sure felt like a series finale — is as far as I’ll be going, I think.
Kids:
A few hours ago, I landed in Los Angeles, turned on my phone, and confirmed what you already know. Sony Pictures Television is replacing me as showrunner on Community, with two seasoned fellows that I’m sure are quite nice - actually, I have it on good authority they’re…
I watched Hugo today. I enjoyed it, mainly for the unexpected (to me) bits of film history in it, fictionalized in some cases, as they were. I paused the film half-way through to read up a little about the truth behind the story, which is always a bad idea when watching fiction.
Of course, the film history is mostly accurate. The characters themselves are a bit fictionalized, or at least streamlined — Georges Méliès was a real person, of course; his wife Jeanne was his mistress while he was making films (they did marry by the time Hugo was set), and his god-daughter Isabelle in the film and the book was his granddaugher Madeleine, in real life.
In the film, Hugo fixes an automaton, uses a key Isabelle wears around her neck to activate it, revealing a clue that leads to the discovery of George’s secret past. Things happen, and later the film ends with Isabelle starting to write the story of Hugo. Isabelle’s sole function in the film, really, is… to wear a necklace.
Reflecting about the story and its characters — Hugo and Isabelle specifically — it just seemed like Hugo should have been the unnecessary one.
Isabelle originated from the original book, The Invention of Hugo Cabret by Brian Selznick, which I haven’t read. But learning of the existence of Madeleine Malthête-Méliès, presumably the inspiration for Isabelle, it struck me that, rather than allow “Isabelle”/Madeleine to serve a real purpose in the story, the author… well, invented Hugo Cabret.
I’m sure I’m as guilty of this as many male writers — only allowing male characters to be the true actors in a story (the ones who actually do things in the story) and sidelining the female characters to serve as love interests and window-dressing, so I’m not passing judgment on Selznick or John Logan (the screenwriter), whoever decided that Isabelle’s role would be so unimportant.
But Méliès is her godfather, after all. He runs a toy shop, which she helps out at, so why not let her be the tinkerer and fix the automaton?
Even setting aside gender — why invent a character wholesale when you have a perfectly good (and in many ways more appropriate) character to serve as your protagonist? Even if you needed a sidekick so that the protagonist could exposit at someone, why shouldn’t Isabelle have been the lead and Hugo the sidekick?
After years of speculation, estimates and projections, the Census Bureau has made it official: White births are no longer a majority in the United States.
Non-Hispanic whites accounted for 49.6 percent of all births in the 12-month period that ended last July, according to Census Bureau data made public on Thursday, while minorities — including Hispanics, blacks, Asians and those of mixed race — reached 50.4 percent, representing a majority for the first time in the country’s history.
Such a turn has been long expected, but no one was certain when the moment would arrive — signaling a milestone for a nation whose government was founded by white Europeans and has wrestled mightily with issues of race, from the days of slavery, through a civil war, bitter civil rights battles and, most recently, highly charged debates over efforts to restrict immigration.
While over all, whites will remain a majority for some time, the fact that a younger generation is being born in which minorities are the majority has broad implications for the country’s economy, its political life and its identity. “This is an important tipping point,” said William H. Frey, the senior demographer at the Brookings Institution, describing the shift as a “transformation from a mostly white baby boomer culture to the more globalized multiethnic country that we are becoming.”
Signs that the country is evolving this way start with the Oval Office, and have swept hundreds of counties in recent years, with 348 in which whites are no longer in the majority. That number doubles when it comes to the toddler population, Mr. Frey said. Whites are no longer the majority in four states and the District of Columbia, and have slipped below half in many major metro areas, including New York, Las Vegas and Memphis.
The New York Times, “Whites Account for Under Half of Births in the U.S.”
Somewhere the Republican Party is blaming Obama for this.
(via inothernews)
Yeah! Down with whitey!
Honestly, I think some people become writers/artists to justify being an asshole
Let’s watch as this gets reblogged and the sarcastic intent gets lost.
FUCK YOU!
Thanks for all the reblogs!!
Here’s a PDF of “Comics Made Me Gay”, the NSFW comics essay form of a talk/presentation that I did at the 2012 Toronto Comics Art Festival. [resharing 10 hours later so more people see it]
https://rapidshare.com/files/3630766202/CMMGlazarov.pdf
“Comics Made Me Gay” illustrates and explains how and why the comics/sequential art form is uniquely suited for representing both the objective and subjective experience of homoeroticism. It features both panel excerpts and full comics page samples from classic superhero comics, from Tom of Finland gay erotic comics and from contemporary gay and gay erotic illustrators and cartoonists.
“Comics Made Me Gay” has got multiple safe and not safe for work images and language so use your best judgment about when and where to read it. It’s formatted in tablet-friendly 2048h x 1536w portrait dimensions.
(Source: dalelazarov)

